Convenient Marriage: Mr. Nelson's Love Trap by Hannah Baker

Theresa thought that it was all due to the happy lot from the previous life that a woman could give birth to a child, why she would harm him?

When Armand took charge of the case, all the lawyers went for him.

“Mr. Bernie, we can’t take charge of this case. We have no chance of winning.”

“That’s right, the woman committed suicide. They will only lose some money. Furthermore, his son died too. The case is irritating but we can’t make it idealistic. We have to face the reality.”

“What’s the reality?” Armand asked.

Anderson said, “We have to face the problems that happen in the reality. There are so many things that we think that they are injustice but there are many deficiencies in the laws for marriage. For example, if a man and a woman cheat on each other, is it a crime?

Obviously, it is not, which limits our authority to defend the parties involved. What is the point of winning or losing this lawsuit? She had died. When one died, nothing is left. At most, we are fighting for a little money for the family of the deceased. What’s the meaning of money compared to a human’s life?

As for us, by winning this case, we are only fighting for a little money for our client. We can’t put the cheater in jail, we can hardly do anything about him, and we will offend him. What do you think is the point of such a lawsuit?”

Anderson’s point was that this case could not be taken charge of. It required a lot of workload and effort and the outcome was not good.

“Then, we’ll just leave it?” Theresa understood his point, that was, this case, no matter win or lose, there was not much meaning.

The man was at fault as he had a mistress. However, he did not go against the law. He did not kill his wife. His wife committed suicide, so there was nothing to do with him.

more than a

that it was unfair, the price for cheating

did he marry her in

a mistress always

a rough saying, it’s

it.” Anderson said, and a few lawyers behind him echoed, just thinking that they could not get much benefits from it and on the other hand,

want to understand too much. He could understand it, but when he saw that the other

it was a punishment for him to let

are you doing this?”

are you doing this? You told us that our occupation is fair and unfair at the same time. We can’t survive in this

whispered, “That was

had a different mindset now. At that time, he only wanted to be prestigious and did many

he knew that his client was at fault but he tried to defend him by all means. He

he did not care about the case. As long as he could gain benefits or prestige from

the lawyers in his law firm, but now, he changed his thoughts

was scourged

was so unlucky now due to the reason that he had done many things that went

easy for us to have such a prestigious firm. I don’t understand why are you so stubborn.” Anderson could not understand. He was not like this before. Why he changed