The Ex-Wife's Burning Elegance

"Because of the Gibson family's immense power, these women and their families had no legal recourse. Over the past few days, I have gathered some evidence of his crimes."

The screen behind her lit up, playing security footage of Stuart involved in public brawls and even forcibly dragging women off the street. Some clips were so graphic they had to be censored. In one video, after a young woman rejected his advances, he was seen shoving her into his car.

Watching the footage, the audience's fists clenched in anger. No one wanted to imagine their own sister or daughter in that position.

The reporters Israel had planted were eager to ask their scathing questions, but Stella controlled the narrative completely. In a live global broadcast, no one dared to break protocol and shout out of turn. Siding with Stuart at this moment would be professional suicide.

Once she saw that the emotions of the reporters and the viewing public were at a boiling point, Stella changed her tack.

right to sentence him. And you are correct. I have no right to pass judgment.

then played the security footage from

property can be legally neutralized by the owner, with no legal repercussions. On that day, I was resting in my suite, which was registered under my name. According to the law, I had exclusive right to that space. Stuart entered without permission and with clear malicious intent, giving me the full

of panic to protect me, shot him. The entire event took place inside my room; we did not pursue him. My bodyguard is not the murderer the media has

cited several articles from German law to support her

angrily shut off his television. He didn't need to see any more to know

success. Online, the narrative completely shifted Joshua was

any potential disturbances, Joshua hadn't attended the event.